<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A journey &#8216;Back to Smalltalk&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikewitters.com/2007/a-journey-back-to-smalltalk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikewitters.com/2007/a-journey-back-to-smalltalk/</link>
	<description>My $0.02 on stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:39:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Witters</title>
		<link>http://mikewitters.com/2007/a-journey-back-to-smalltalk/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Witters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.4/?p=28#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree.  The pure object oriented nature of Smalltalk is, at minimum, what should be illustrated in every OO class.  Smalltalk is a beautiful language.  Unfortunately it just didn&#039;t do what was necessary to stay mainstream.  Seaside might help, but its no leap from what I&#039;ve seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree.  The pure object oriented nature of Smalltalk is, at minimum, what should be illustrated in every OO class.  Smalltalk is a beautiful language.  Unfortunately it just didn&#8217;t do what was necessary to stay mainstream.  Seaside might help, but its no leap from what I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klhenry97</title>
		<link>http://mikewitters.com/2007/a-journey-back-to-smalltalk/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>klhenry97</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.1.4/?p=28#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Smalltalk rules.

Yeah, I know, lousy comment.  But for the time in my life that I first encountered it, it was the perfect language.  I fought to escape COBOL, and when I sat down to do my &quot;hello world&quot; in Smalltalk, I instantly got it.  I didn&#039;t know what object-oriented programming was.  I just learned Smalltalk, and object-oriented was an afterthought.  Java was a disappointment, but I had to go there.  I found that Smalltalk is the perfect foundation.  It should be used in Programming 101 in every programmer mill in Mumbai, Bangalore, and Hyderabad.  That and the GoF book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smalltalk rules.</p>
<p>Yeah, I know, lousy comment.  But for the time in my life that I first encountered it, it was the perfect language.  I fought to escape COBOL, and when I sat down to do my &#8220;hello world&#8221; in Smalltalk, I instantly got it.  I didn&#8217;t know what object-oriented programming was.  I just learned Smalltalk, and object-oriented was an afterthought.  Java was a disappointment, but I had to go there.  I found that Smalltalk is the perfect foundation.  It should be used in Programming 101 in every programmer mill in Mumbai, Bangalore, and Hyderabad.  That and the GoF book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
